Taliban and Afghanistan

In response of article with above title below this post.
------------ -------
Raja wrote:
U.S and NATO troops are embattling these insurgent Taliban ever since the former invaded Afghanistan in October 2001, following the incident of 9/11.

TURKMAN: Not true. Taliban had not resurfaced in Afghanistan until Pakistan had re-armed and redeployed them back a year later.
------------ --
Raja wrote:
To their hard-luck, these foreign forces could not subdue the resistance put up by Afghan Taliban and masses in spite of having superior weaponry and despotic tactics.

TURKMAN: Despotic Tactics? Not USA, Pakistan Army's and Taliban's. Resistance by Masses? Which masses? Not Afghans. They hate Taliban otherwise, Taliban would have won Elections. Taliban could not even field a single candidate in Elections and Masses are with Pakistani Agents, the Taliban?
------------ ----
Raja wrote:
Rather their tyrannical acts further fuelled the insurgency in that country.

TURKMAN:
More Pak Agent Taliban infiltrated by Pak Army, more the Insurgency. What's so strange about it? NATO US Troops, building Schools, Hospitals, giving free books to kids, School Supplies and Candy are Tyrannical and Taliban Sneak Attack Terrorists are not? Don't Afghans know, what kind of Tyrants Taliban were in their 5 year rule of Afghanistan?
---------
Raja wrote:
After having analysed, the consecutive failure of US and NATO troops, and their counter-productive results, Afghan President Mr. Hamid Karazai, decided to launch reconciliatory efforts to integrate the Taliban into the main stream of Afghan society and the Government.

TURKMAN: Karzai would do anything to remain in power after US withdraws in July, 2011 and he knows, unless he breaks away local people, who are co-operating with Pak Taliban from them, he can not rule. He wants to negotiate with Pak Army actually so, it stops sending Taliban in Afghanistan to destabilize or conquer Afghanistan again.
------------ ---
Raja wrote:
Since Pakistan, as a brotherly Islamic and neighbourly country is helping the Afghan Government in the process, therefore, is linked with the Taliban.

TURKMAN:
Oh sure, Afghanistan' s birth Enemy that is ruling more than half of population of Afghans on other side of Durand Line, the country that had brutalized Afghans for decades through her interference in Afghan Politics through her JehaaDis and Taliban is now going to help Afghanistan. Who is fooling who here?
------------ ----
Raja wrote:
Pakistan indeed, believes that peace in this war-torn country; Afghanistan is a key to its own internal stability, therefore, decided to encourage and helped the Afghan Government to negotiate with the Taliban; the main
insurgent group.

TURKMAN: 'War-torn Country'? Yes because of war imposed by Pakistan since 1979. 'Key to internal Stability'? Sure, Pakistan was very Internally Stable, when its Army and Taliban had conquered Afghanistan in 1996. Definitely Pakistan had become Internally un-table during Afghanistan' s in-fighting from 1973 to 1977,
right? Gen. Zia was overthrown and Taliban were killing thousands of Pakistanis every year, right? ... How the hell you dare to call Taliban an Insurgent Group, when they are not even Afghans? Should not they be called Paki Invaders or 'Kharjian', as Afghans call them?
------------ ----
Raja wrote:
Gen. Keyani says,“Pakistan cannot wish anything for Afghanistan which it cannot wish for itself�.

TURKMAN:
But who is Pakistan? Pakistan is Pakistan Army ruling Pakistan directly or indirectly through the curtain. Sure, almost all Punjabi Pakistan Army would like to occupy Afghanistan just like it has occupied Pakistan. Proof is, slaughter of East Pakistanis, Balochis, Sindhis, Mohajirs by Pakistan Army. Is not Pak Army killing Balochis even now?
------------ --
Raja wrote:
The malicious nature of the report could be well imagined from the fact that Afghan Taliban are forced to obey the Pakistani intelligence agencies because their families are in Pakistan.
.
TURKMAN: Yeah but the problem is, as soon as Pakistani PushToon hired, trained and armed by Pak Army enter Afghanistan to terrorize US and Afghans, you call them 'Afghan Taliban'. This does not change the fact that their Families are living in Pakistan by your lie that they are not Pakistanis. You can try to fool the world but can not fool your own Pakistanis.
------------
Raja wrote:
Whereas, a large number of Afghan leadership had their residences in Pakistan. Even President Karazai had stayed in Pakistan for a long duration and still owns a house in Pakistan.
.
TURKMAN: When in practice, Pakistanis Laws prohibit any Foreigners from purchasing any Property. When I was in Pakistan, I had found out that without ISI's permission, I could not get Phone installed in my rented house because I was a Foreigner (a US Citizen) despite being Pakistani also. ... We are not talking about a few rich Afghans here. Poor illiterate Pakistani PushToons were recruited as Taliban. Pakistan's ISI had not gone in to Afghanistan to recruit Afghans as Taliban in 1994. How come all those so called 'Afghan Taliban' understand and speak Urdu if they are really Afghans? How much more are you going to lie, Moslim? I thought lying was a Basic Sin in Islam.
------------ ----
Raja wrote:

The argument is further augmented by the fact that, if a researcher, who indeed was an official representative of UK Government, could find that real leadership of Taliban why cannot over 150,000 large US and NATO
forces; whose UK troops are also part of, could trace them.
.
TURKMAN: The argument is further augmented by the fact that, if a researcher, who indeed was an official representative of Pak Army Government, could find that real leadership of Taliban, why cannot 700,000 strong Pak Armed forces; whose troops are also part of Taliban, could trace them for the last 9 years after verbally siding with USA against Taliban? How can just total of 10,000 Taliban in Pakistan and Afghanistan blatantly attack Foreign Troops in Afghanistan, NATO Warehouses and NATO Supply Convoys and Pakistanis in Pakistan if Pak Army has not been financing, training and arming them?
------------ -
Raja wrote:
Why did they (Foreign Secret Agencies) fail to trace them (Taliban) and taken them to the task, instead of killing the innocent Afghans, once they are busy in undertaking their religious and social ceremonies?
.
TURKMAN:
Because whenever they do, you declare them Innocent Pak or Afghan Civilians. Why Taliban pretend to be always having a Religious Ceremony, they are attacked? Why they carry Arms and Ammunition instead of a Dead Person on the Cot on their Shoulders carrying it towards Afghan Border in a Pretend Religious Ceremony of a Fake Funeral? Why they celebrate fake Religious Ceremony of a Wedding to carry out their Sneak Attacks? If your beloved Taliban and Al Qaeda Terrorists are not dieing in US Drone Attacks, why your crying so much against them? Why are you bleeding Tears of Blood for killings of so called Innocent Afghans in Afghanistan, when its not your country? Why is Pak Army now so sympathetic to Afghans, when it was not during slaughtering a million of them helping Taliban during its occupation of Afghanistan pretending to be Taliban speaking in Punjabi and Urdu? Should Afghans forget all that also?
------------ -
Raja wrote:
Furthermore, Pakistan neither desires to use Afghan soil as its strategic depth nor has intention to use the Taliban (Afghan or Pakistani Taliban) as its strategic strength.
.
TURKMAN:
Not Pakistan but Pak Army's Generals and ISI do so, they can make money by smuggling everything in to Pakistan Custom Duty plus Tax free and selling it at a huge Profit under Afghan Transit Trade Agreement like
before during Taliban rule of Afghanistan plus they want to keep making money by their Heroin Export to Europe. Total yearly Profit in billions of dollars.
------------ --
Raja wrote:
The report indeed is an effort to defame Pakistani leadership and its premier intelligence agency; ISI, which has maintained a clean conduct throughout its material life. This spotless intelligence network indeed, neither has established inhuman camps like Guantanamo bay nor colonised its neighbours or undertook massacre during WW-I and WW-II.
.
TURKMAN:
How true. Except for slaughter of tens of thousands of Pakistanis in Government Custody. How can ISI have a Gitmo, when it does not believe in leaving anybody alive that it arrests? 'Khas kum JehaaN Paak'. 'Naa
ho go jo BaaNs; Toe kaisay bajay BaaNsri?'. Very clean conduct indeed.
----------
*Dr Raja Muhammad Khan is Ph. D in International Relations from Karachi University. Now he is an Associate Professor with National University of Defence, run by Pakistan Army. Dr Khan’s focus is on South Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East, on advice of ISI that he works for. He is regular contributor to* *www.opinion- maker.org* , the Website of Pakistan Army ran by its Agency, ISI.

between me, the judge and the al-qur'an

One of my friend who works for the department of Justice with US Government gave my name to this Judge. He called me and ask me to come to his Synagogue. I went their and ask him what can I do for you He said  I want to know about Islam. I said your honor let us not get into this topic. Because i will say things and you will not like and you will send me to the GUEST HOUSE of US govt for the next 100 years all expenses paid.

He said NO No  let me get the Rabi. I said OK the Rabi joined the meeting. I asked what do you want to discuss. The Rabi gave a list of topics it has to do with similarities and differences between Islam and Judaism.  The Rabi had to leave and I was stuck with The Judge.  He said go and tell me similarities and differences between the the two I said well these two religions are very close to one another, but there are few differences. He said tell me tell me I said according to your holy book your God created the heaven and earth in six days and took rest on the seventh DAY.

The God of the Quran created the heaven and earth but does not get tired , hungry, sick and there is no such thing has God taking rest The SUN has not taken rest for the last billions of years.

He said it make sense. Next I said there are 1.5 billion Muslimswho believe that Ismail was offered has a sacrifice but there are over 2 Billion Christians and Jewish people who say Isaac was offered has a sacrifice . Judge do you know who his right. He said I don't know. I said I will tell you. According to your Holy book  Ismail was the older son and Isaac was the younger son. Ibrahim had a dream in which God told him to go and sacrifice your son your ONLY SON. Ibrahim took his SON HIS ONLY SON Ibrahim was ready to sacrifice his son his ONLY SON. The angel of God called him and said  Ibrahim God his pleased with you YOU were ready to sacrifice your SON YOUR ONLY SON.
 

I said   Judge over and over again your holy book says YOUR SON YOUR ONLY SON That means this whole thing happen before the birth of ISAAC  I said Judge I told this story to Pastor Michael, Pastor Michael said Kamal you are completely wrong because Ismael was the son of a slave woman and was not a blessed child.  Judge I told my wonderful Pastor Michael, Pastor Michael. God of this Universe understands your mentality. So in the Holy Bible it says If a man had two sons one from a slave/hated  woman. If the older son his from a slave woman he will be a blessed child, because he represents his initial strength. The Judge laughed and i went on for an hour.

After that he told me do you have a copy of the Quran. I said yes it is in the car and he almost picked up my briefcase. I said NO NO please and we went to the car I gave him the copy of the Quran. He wanted to come and visit the Islamic center. When he came to the Islamic center During one of his visits I told the so called scholars of the  Center I have this high ranking Judge who wants to visit our Center. When he came my brothers were fighting with one another trying to show who is more knowledgeble. The Judge after the meeting  said Kamal I felt I was in the courtroom where two lawyers always fight with each other. This Judge has everything white , over 6 ft , has beautiful wife two sons access to the white house, But still deep  desire to find the right religion. I ask the Judge my daughter(lawyer) needs a job. He said I will give her a Job. I told him but she is a Hijabi lady. Kamal she is your daughter I will find a slot for her. The Jews/ Christian  do not teach their holy books cover to cover to their kids in the Sunday school. These BOOKS have too much pornography, stories that do not make sense.

That is the reason the founding fathers of America. Decided to separate the church and the STATE. They are desparetely looking for a better product.

I just came out of a restaurant . One of the Hindu lady just got out of work . I ask her Maji who you are waiting for she said I am waiting for my son to pick me up. I told her Maji I will drop you home. She was so happy, if it was not for me she had to wait till 12 p.m in the night for her son to come and pick her up. For me whether it is Judge or the restaurant worker both are important.

Please love the non muslims they are ALLAh /Bhagwan/ God customers. The Quran says the messenger will be a witness against you and you will be a witness against mankind. Your JOB is to convey his message not to hurt them. This is the shop of the creator of heaven and earth and yours is a saleman JOB. If you fight for piece of Land you will not get it in a million years. YOUR JOB IS TO FIGHT FOR THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF THE NON MUSLIMS.  LOVE THEM EXPLAIN TO THEM ,tell them to WORSHIP THE GUY who PUTS THE FUEL IN THE SUN. WHO IS THE LIGHT OF HEAVEN AND EARTH Islam is the best religion but Muslims are its worst followers.

annual reporting requirements on U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

The American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act (ACWIA), Public Law 105-277, Division C, imposes annual reporting requirements on U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) concerning the countries of origin and occupations of, educational levels attained by, and compensation paid to, aliens who were issued visas or otherwise provided nonimmigrant status under section 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) of the INA during the previous fiscal year.

To fulfill this requirement, USCIS submits the following report for Fiscal Year 2009, October I, 2008 - September 30, 2009.

Highlights:

• The number of H-l B petitions filed decreased 15 percent from 288,764 in Fiscal Year 2008 to 246,647 in Fiscal Year 2009.
• The number of H-l B petitions approved decreased 22 percent from 276,252 in Fiscal Year 2008 to 214,271 in Fiscal Year 2009.
• Approximately 48 percent of all H-IB petitions approved in Fiscal Year 2009 were for workers born in India.
• Two-thirds of H-l B petitions approved in Fiscal Year 2009 were for workers between the ages of25 and 34.
• Forty-one percent of H-I B petitions approved in Fiscal Year 2009 were for workers with a bachelor's degree, 40 percent had a master's degree, 13 percent had a doctorate, and 6 percent were for workers with a professional degree.
• About 41 percent ofH-IB petitions approved in Fiscal Year 2009 were for workers in computer-related occupations.
• The median salary of beneficiaries of approved petitions increased to $64,000 in Fiscal Year 2009, $4,000 more than in Fiscal Year 2008.

my application be denied for writing "J2_ instead of " Entered on B2 and changed to J2"

My wifes sister currently filed an I-130 for her. One of the qtn asked ---

Q14."If your relative is currently in the U.S., complete the following He or she arrived as a: (visitor, student, stowaway, without inspection, etc.)"
 

I answered it as "J2"
 

Now here is what happened ----
My wife entered as a visitor on B2 and changed her status from B2 to J2 while in the USA.
Since the new I-94 says J2 and has an expiration date matching the DS 2019 validity, I entered those details in the I-94 expiration date.
 

My qtn is ----
Will my application be denied for writing "J2_ instead of " Entered on B2 and changed to J2"
Should I call USCIS and tell them about this? Will this delay my processing time? Or it does not matter as long as the I-94 details are accurate.

ANSWER : 

You, personally, have no standing in this petition (filed by your sister-in-law for your wife). Any contact with the USCIS should be initiated by your sister-in-law, the petitioner, if she feels that it's necessary.

Does your wife expect to stay in a valid J-2 status in USA while the I-130 will be pending? What is her country of birth?