DO YOU KNOW WHO IS A GORKHA?

Do you know – who is a Gorkha? Do you know is there existence Gorkha language? I know very well that you are unable to give reply because you do not know the real picture; but as this esteemed weekly in your hand, so you have published your idiotic, nonsense article by grossly violating human rights and strengthen to commit crime of genocide (Crimes against Peace and Security of Mankind 1996). 

There was no existence; there is no existence of Gorkha language in India, in Nepal and in the world and in this regard please check the history, census reports of India and Nepal, records of Nepal and India etc. EGG OF A HORSE AND GORKHA LANGUAGE, BOTH, ARE SAME. 

In the census of India, since 1931, mother tongue is one of the criteria. Mother tongue is in use as Nepali; previous name of Nepali is Gorkhali; according to available history, this Gorkhali language renamed as Nepali in 1930; language of the Gorkha kingdom was Gorkhali i.e. previous name of Nepali was Gorkhali; people of

Gorkha kingdom was known as Gorkhali; Gorkha kingdom captured the Nepal valley (present name Kathmandu valley) in 1769 and established the country Nepal and the Gorkha kingdom merged with the country Nepal. People of Nepal are known as Nepali. 

It is the history and empirical evidence that Nepalese emerged from Nepal, migrated from Nepal to India and settled all over India, especially Darjeeling and Sikkim were submerged under the incoming flood of Nepalese immigrants. 

Previous name of Gorkhali language was Khaskura (means language or speech of the Khas people). People/community of Khas are Hindus and they are Nepali; they embraced Hinduism with caste system eight hundred years ago. Khas people divided as Brahman (Bahun), Khatriya (Chetri/Chhetri) and touchable, untouchable classes. Thakuris (khatrya) are between Bahun and Chetri. Chetri/Chhtri surname is a Khas khatriya. Claiming as Gorkha, and supporting, promoting as Gorkha is a cheat case.

You cannot rename Khas people who are Nepali in any other name. Where is your authority to call them Gorkha? Government of India and Government of West Bengal, both, have boldly violated Hinduism in Darjeeling by signing Tripartite Agreement/Memorandum of Understanding on 18th July 2011. 

Violating the CONSITUTION OF INDIA, grossly violating human rights, violating SECULARISM principle of India, violating basic democratic established norms, committing crime of genocide (Crimes against Peace and Security of Mankind 1996) an unconstitutional Tripartite Agreement/Memorandum of Understanding signed on 18th July in Siliguri (Pintail village) in Darjeeling district between Government of India, Government of West Bengal and Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM) i.e. the organization of false, fictitious (untrue, unnatural) so-called Gorkahs to set-up "Gorkhaland Territorial Administration" [GTA] in Darjeeling by completely wiped out the sacrosanct name "Darjeeling", replacing it with the uncivilized, ill-bread name "Gorkhaland" [the land of the Gorkha mercenaries i.e. land of the Nepali mercenaries i.e. land of the Nepali criminals]. Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM) i.e. the organization of false, fictitious (untrue, unnatural) so-called Gorkahs are destroying Nepali community. 

I have mentioned in this post only a little part of the fact. After that I will write again. 

NOTE: I have published a book in June 2011 in Bengali – Prasanga Darjeeling – Gorkha Ke (Issue Darjeeling: Who is a Gorkha). Again a book in English, proposed name "Issue Darjeeling: Nepali Mercenaries & Crime of Genocide" might be published in November 2011.

Are we indians the born cheats

Rajaratnam of a hedge fund in US is sent to jail for 11 years and imposed heavy fines and recovery of defrauded profits by a US court.It has sent strong signals.But surprisingly US government has not acted against many bankers who are basically cheats and looters and have brought US economy near ruins.It is time to nail down banking guys all over the world.WE have been demanding this for last 10 years.The fattened bankers and fraudulent and third grade economists are main cause of world problems.

One such economists is ruining this country as head of a mafia ruling the country.he must go now and should be ideally tried for mass public harm and treason.

India is one of most corrupt and through rate country in world while our corrupt media men and politicians keep singing chants of India shining and India developing.Just to fool people who are becoming corrupt, poor and weak by the day.Under 2% of Indians comprising of big businessmen,politicians, so called premier school guys and central services cadres are conniving with teacher and have let loose loot and plunder under slogans of reforms and globalisation.This must stop now.In india daily circular trading and insider trading is dong merrily and no one bothers.SEBI and Madras high court in connivance with Sterling group of Chennai killed Tree magnum scheme and gulped crores of rupees of small investors in name of social forestry.In fact High court is helping the crooks to loot and get away with crimes.

We daily see that suddenly share prices of some companies suddenly start rising or going down.without nay logic and reason.Idea is to loot MFs and small investors.

In India we have regulations only on papers with every one in authority having one goal to make money as much as possible.After MM singh took over babus are on loose and have been given Abhaydan to loot.No accountability.handsome perks, imported cars and foreign trips.5 days working.Jai Ho globalisation ki.

The bloody Indians are born thieves,tax evaders and cheats.That is why we became slaves.A large number of Indian businessman are frauds and profiteers and deserve to be in jail and their money forfeited to national exchequer.

The only way crime and cheating can be stopped is by giving 20 years sentence and imposing 100% penalty of money in time and also recovery of cheated or stolen money.A number of politicians and babus and police men should also be sent to jail for life.To curb crime the criminal should be financially and socially destroyed.India should also being a mass public fraud bill to deter companies and education Institutes making tall and false claims and cheating gullible investors,students and customers.The media is not meant to cheat people.Same way politicians who lie sitting in top position and give false statements and false assurances should also be jailed.One has to keep the promise.Specially when made to seek votes and nominations.India badly needs ethical and moral resurgence.

Congress must be wiped out in elections and people should boycott this fake party unless they get rid of fake Gandhis and recover 1 lac crore looted by various politicians in congress regime.One should not forget that slowly but surely cases are being weakened by corrupt politicians and CBI under knowledge of MM singh to let all 2G guys go scot free and all those in other scams.It as Singh who quietly moved amendments for RTI act on behest of his stooge bureaucracy but was caught midway.Such people are heading the country.It is unfortunate.All of us should expose such guys and see they are ousted and punished.WE should make class III and IV and rural people around us how India has been looted and how morality has sunk in 60 years under major time rule of congress party.It cant be ignored.

See how loot is going on.Nestle raised 190 gm milk power pack price form Rs 58 to 70 in one stroke in september.Gillette(P&G) selling substandard twin blade packs like 7 O'clock at three times prices when Singh took over and with life of 2-3 shaves only.No one listened to complaints.MNcs are out on loot in country including banks.

Maruti has raised price of a basket from rs 60 to 460 and price of front axle assembly from rs 2100 to Rs 2700 in one go.

We can see examples of loot everywhere.The list is endless.T otal scams of more than 5 lac crores have surfaced since Singh took over UPA government.

IIMs have raised fees from 60000 to 7.5 lacs.And professors are being given rs 50 lacs package from rs 5 lacs.What kind of reforms and globalisation is this? what is logic in this but loot.Third rate engineering and MBA type Institutes are charging rs 4-8 lacs for course as against rs 70000 to rs 2 lacs by affiliated colleges.All this in name of reforms and globalisation.

The babudom salaries have been revised three times since singh has come.Their working hours have been reduced by 20%.No babus is being fired for efficiency and corruption.It is free for all in country which our fraudulent experts sitting on top call reforms, development and globalisation. can there be bigger fraud with nation than this.

The truth is Indian appear no where .In top global brands list,Top education Institution lists and not even in payment list of commercial websites.

Our philosophy and religion teaches us personal salvation and also depicts this world is illusion and maya. So it creates two types of people in India. One set becomes extremely selfish seeking only personal salvation at the cost of society and nation.  Other set of people worship mediocrity, abhor excel lance, consider our body as torn cloth and generally do not take interest in the worldly matter striving for moksha resulting in defeatist fatalistic superstitious society, indiscipline, treachery, filth, lack of respect of law etc. So we get worst of both the worlds. The root cause of all our evils are in our ideals, philosophy and religion.

Obama agrees to kill citizens of the United States without trial

[Remember….written law is intended for government …however government turns-it-around and MIS-applies it to those not in government …while ignoring it themselves.]

"A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side. " 

~Aristotle

"Far best is he who knows all things himself; Good, he that hearkens when men counsel right; But he who neither knows, nor lays to heart Another's wisdom, is a useless wight."

~Hesiod

The Obama administration's secret legal memorandum that opened the door to the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born radical Muslim cleric hiding in Yemen, found that it would be lawful only if it were not feasible to take him alive, according to people who have read the document.

The memo, written last year, followed months of extensive deliberations and offers a glimpse into the legal debate that led to one of the most significant decisions made by President Obama — to move ahead with the killing of an American citizen without a trial.

The memo provided the justification for acting despite an executive order banning assassinations, a federal law against murder, protections in the Bill of Rights and various strictures of the international laws of war, according to people familiar with the analysis. The memo, however, was narrowly drawn to the specifics of Mr. Awlaki's case and did not establish a broad new legal doctrine.

read the complete article here

HOW MUCH CLEARER COULD THIS LAW BE?? You read it….don't let the "judges" and "executive branch" lawyers read it for you…thus considering you ward-of-the-court stupid.]

18USC1119: Law intended for government

http://1d056128.seriousdeals.net

http://3f1f46d4.seriousdeals.net PART I 

http://fdb0e801.seriousdeals.net; CHAPTER 51 

How Current is This?

(a) Definition.— In this section, "national of the United States" has the meaning stated in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

(b) Offense.— A person who, being a national of the United States, kills or attempts to kill a national of the United States while such national is outside the United States but within the jurisdiction of another country shall be punished as provided under sections

(c) Limitations on Prosecution.— (1) No prosecution may be instituted against any person under this section

except upon the written approval of the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, or an Assistant Attorney General, which function of approving prosecutions may not be delegated. No prosecution shall be approved if prosecution has been previously undertaken by a foreign country for the same conduct. (2) No prosecution shall be approved under this section unless the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of State, determines that the conduct took place in a country in which the person is no longer present, and the country lacks the ability to lawfully secure the person's return. A determination by the Attorney General under this paragraph is not subject to judicial review.

All Persons Executing Void Judgments or Sentences are In Law, Trespassers

Where a Court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide every question which occurs in the cause; and whether its decision be correct or otherwise, its judgment, until reversed, is regarded as binding in every other Court. But, if it act without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal, in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers. 

This distinction runs through all the cases on the subject; and it proves, that the jurisdiction of any Court exercising authority 341#####341 over a subject, may be inquired into in every Court, when the proceedings of the former are relied on and brought before the latter by the party claiming the benefit of such proceedings. 

It is well known that the jurisdiction and authority of the County Courts of Kentucky are derived wholly, from the statute law of the state. In argument, we were referred to no statute which was supposed, either in terms, or by fair construction, to confer upon the County Court any supervising or controlling power over the acts of the clerk, in taking, in his office, the acknowledgment of a deed, or in recording it, upon an acknowledgment there taken by him. We have sought in vain for such a provision, and it is believed none such exists. No such supervising and controlling power can result to the Court, from the general relations which exist between a Court and its clerk; for in this case, the statutes confer upon the clerk, in his office, a distinct, independent, personal authority, to be exercised by him upon his own judgment and responsibility. We think, therefore, with the Circuit Court that the County Court had no jurisdiction or authority to order the after certificate of Mrs. Elliott's privy examination to be made and recorded. Elliott v. Peirsol, 26 U.S. 328, 340-41 (1828) http://94189ba3.linkbucks.com

Indigenous peoples suffer abuses in race for natural resources

Among key concerns, Mr. Anaya included the gradual loss of control by indigenous peoples over lands, territories and natural resources; water source depletion and contamination for drinking, farming and grazing; the adverse effects of water and airborne pollution on overall community health; and an increase in infectious diseases spread by interaction with workers or settlers.

Another concern was the adverse impact on indigenous social structures and cultures, including alarming rates of alcoholism and prostitution previously unheard of among such peoples, imported by illegal loggers or miners, non-indigenous workers and industry personnel in specific projects, and increased traffic due to the construction of roads and other infrastructure.\------------------------------------------------------------------------------------http://6e1e9ab7.goneviral.com --------------------------------------------------------

Peoples suffer abuses in race for natural resources – UN rights expertSpecial Rapporteur James Anaya20 September 2011 – Extraction of natural resources and other major development projects in or near the territories of indigenous peoples is one of the most significant sources of abuse of their human rights worldwide, an independent United Nations expert warned today."In its prevailing form, the model for advancing with natural resource extraction within the territories of indigenous peoples appears to run counter to the self-determination of indigenous peoples in the political, social and economic spheres," the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples James Anaya told the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.In a report based on answers to a questionnaire he distributed to governments, indigenous peoples and organizations, business corporations and other actors, he cited conflicting viewpoints on the potential adverse impact and benefits of such activities as mining, forestry, oil and natural gas extraction and hydroelectric projects in indigenous territories.

He said he had made it a priority to reconcile the differing views and courses of action to ensure the full protection of indigenous rights and promote best practices through a broad dialogue with governments, indigenous peoples' organizations, corporate actors and international institutions, in which consensus-building would be a key element.

"The lack of a minimum common ground for understanding the key issues by all actors concerned entails a major barrier for the effective protection and realization of indigenous peoples' rights," he added, praising a new Peruvian law compelling private companies to consult indigenous communities before going ahead with major projects such as mining.Among key concerns, Mr. Anaya included the gradual loss of control by indigenous peoples over lands, territories and natural resources; water source depletion and contamination for drinking, farming and grazing; the adverse effects of water and airborne pollution on overall community health; and an increase in infectious diseases spread by interaction with workers or settlers.

Another concern was the adverse impact on indigenous social structures and cultures, including alarming rates of alcoholism and prostitution previously unheard of among such peoples, imported by illegal loggers or miners, non-indigenous workers and industry personnel in specific projects, and increased traffic due to the construction of roads and other infrastructure."Submissions by indigenous peoples and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) also reported an escalation of violence by government and private security forces as a consequence of extractive operations in indigenous territories, especially against indigenous leaders," Mr. Anaya noted. "A general repression of human rights was reported in situations where entire communities had voiced their opposition to extractive operations."Several governments highlighted the key importance of natural resource extraction projects for their domestic economies that, reportedly accounting for up to 60 to 70 per cent of the gross national product (GNP) in some countries, with positive benefits for indigenous peoples.

Mining companies noted that indigenous peoples have been direct beneficiaries of basic infrastructure construction such as roads, communications, electricity and water services, as well as health and educational opportunities.But most indigenous peoples underscored the adverse effects on their environment, culture and societies, which they said outweighed the minimal or short-term benefits arising out of extractive operations.

For example, a member of the Pemon people of Venezuela reported that benefits from extractive industries were not a top priority within the community, which sought "healthy communities, with no infections, in a pollution-free environment," Mr. Anaya said.Similarly, an organization representing the traditional authorities of the Cofan people of Colombia concluded that "indigenous peoples are left with no option other than to try to find something positive for their communities out of the disaster left behind by the extraction of oil, mineral, and other resources" in their lands."The vast majority of indigenous peoples' responses, many of which stemmed from the direct experience of specific projects affecting their territories and communities, rather emphasized a common perception of disenfranchisement, ignorance of their rights and concerns on the part of States and businesses enterprises, and constant life insecurity in the face of encroaching extractive activities," Mr. Anaya said.